“You could see there was pretty material outperformance in Tulsa compared to the rest of the country as it was being rolled out,” says Andrew Robson, president and chief revenue officer of Earnest Research.
Undoubtedly, these results likely weren’t foreign to McDonald’s brass. Yet, Robson says it’s a challenging task taking a sample size and trying to envision its effect nationally.
“Often times, what we’ve come to learn is that in test markets there is a lot of ad spend behind those rollouts to get awareness out,” he says. “The question mark is a. what was the amount of ad spend that went into Tulsa for example? Did that have a meaningful impact in the uptick in business? And if so, could they achieve that as they roll it out nationwide? That’s a good question.”
Let’s shift to delivery. Chief financial officer Kevin Ozan presented at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Consumer and Retail Technology Conference on March 14.
He revealed some interesting figures from the company’s expansive UberEATS platform. McDonald’s is currently delivering to more than 5,000 U.S. restaurants, which is solid growth from its spring announcement in 2017 that it would be in 3,500 locations by the end of June.
But there was always going to be a question of how this would play out from a financial perspective. McDonald’s, for the most part, isn’t exactly designed physically to adhere to this kind of platform. In other words, there aren’t designated pick-up stations or added workers specifically for off-premise business. So would an influx of delivery orders stuff throughput? Would walk-in customers waiting in line carry that burden? Would employees?
Ozan, however, had an amusing, yet pragmatic answer: “I won't surmise why that is or what they're doing prior to ordering McDonald's, but it's become—so we know it's a younger demographic, we know it's the time of day that's attractive to us.”
So these delivery orders are not coming at peak times necessarily. In fact, Ozan said 60 percent of orders are in the evening and late night, especially overnight when you get closer to college campuses. What Ozan is alluding to then is the added business of younger consumers who might have just done something that’s keeping them from leaving the house or dorm, and are suddenly very hungry. Don’t really need to fill in the lines there.
About 65–70 percent of delivery sales are incremental to McDonald’s existing business in participating restaurants, up from 60 percent when McDonald’s first tested UberEATS to 2,000 restaurants.
When you look at this growth, it’s promising on multiple fronts: McDonald’s is gaining business when it has capacity—dinner and overnight—and adding orders incremental to its existing revenue. There’s also the less tangible benefit, which is the chance that some of these late-night, younger dinners might return for breakfast, or lunch, or maybe they might tell somebody else who hasn’t been to McDonald’s in a while to give it a shot. This can, perhaps, give McDonald’s and some of its other lesser-publicized initiatives a millennial-driven and Gen Z audience it didn’t have before.
For example, something liked its recent climate change plan, where McDonald’s said it plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions related to restaurants and offices by 36 percent by 2030, can find a new customer base with a willingness to listen. Something along the lines of, “I didn’t know McDonald’s wanted to reduce emissions intensity by 31 percent.” And again, some of those less calculable changes, such as removing artificial preservatives from Chicken McNuggets, now suddenly make a lot more sense when you imagine an influx of new customers into McDonald’s longstanding pool of guests. First reaching this demographic through their convenience- and technology-driven bias, and then appealing to their socially conscious side with a nod to real menu improvements, can only benefit McDonald’s long-term. The chain has, in a multi-pronged way, been preparing for the future without really broadcasting it.
From the franchisee level, operators pay a commission fee to UberEATS for each delivery, which means orders carry a lower margin than typical tickets. Ozan said the fact that 70 percent incremental is giving franchisees more dollars and the company’s breakeven, incrementally is well below 50 percent.
“So there's a lot of room, let's say before we get anywhere close to breakeven from an incrementally standpoint,” he said.
As Motley Fool points out, this is referencing a profitability study known as cost-volume-profit analysis. Meaning, franchisees cover their fixed operating costs through existing sales and the only costs related to incremental delivery are variables—food and labor. So, delivery sales have a lower breakeven point, giving the operator plenty of room to cover that commission. It’s a revenue stream without additional overhead investment, unlike the “Experience of the Future” redesign, which calls for kiosk, exterior and interior upgrades. Not to mention the McCafe beverage equipment upgrades in recent years that have pinched franchisees.
“Adding incremental profits to franchisees' bottom lines—with zero investment on their part—is reason enough to label McDonald's expanding delivery business a tangible success,” Motely Fool wrote.
All this success is a better look than early results from the $1 $2 $3 Value Menu.McDonald’s had its worst dollar decline in its history as a publicly traded company March 2 when shares closed the day down 4.8 percent. It was also the company’s biggest percentage drop since October 2008. The week as a whole was McDonald’s worst percentage decline for shares since 2008 and the steepest total dollar decline for a week ever, off 9.1 percent.
This came after David Palmer of RBC Capital Markets cut his expectations “due to deteriorating industry conditions and a disappointing early sales impact from the $1, $2, $3 value menu." Palmer lowered his price target for McDonald’s stock by 9 percent from $190 to $170. Shares were trading for $157.04 early Friday.
The first-quarter same-store sales forecast also fell to 1 percent from 3.5 percent. A FactSet consensus is calling for $3.8 percent growth. Palmer’s $170 price target is still nearly 15 percent higher than the $149.27 price McDonald’s closed that day, a level not seen since last May. He also reiterated an outperform rating, despite the cut.
“Our sense is that the $1 $2 $3 platform stole attention from local marketing, particularly at breakfast, which likely slowed as a consequence. In addition, we believe $1 $2 $3 menu’s positioning as a variety play protected franchisee profitability but lacked the ‘hero’ item necessary to resonate with value-conscious consumers,” the RBC Capital Markets analysts wrote.
In pretty much all ways, this strikes as a short-term issue that won’t dampen McDonald’s future outlook. While McDonald’s competitive set in the value market is critical, it’s clearly a piece in what’s becoming a very well-thought out and lucrative puzzle for the chain. These dots, also, are just starting to connect.